Actions
Task #6683
closedFix OpenNebula vxlan creation / check differences to manual creation
Start date:
05/13/2019
Due date:
05/24/2019
% Done:
0%
Estimated time:
PM Check date:
Description
Creating manually¶
Creating vxlans manually works in our networks:
[17:54:12] server2.place6:~# ip -6 link add vxlan4242 type vxlan id 4242 dstport 4789 local 2a0a:e5c0:2:1:21b:21ff:febb:68d8 group ff05::4242 dev bond0.11 ttl 5 [18:07:33] server3.place6:~# ip -6 link add vxlan4242 type vxlan id 4242 dstport 4789 local 2a0a:e5c0:2:1:21b:21ff:febb:68f0 group ff05::4242 dev bond0.11 ttl 5 [18:08:05] server2.place6:~# ip addr add 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2/64 dev vxlan4242 [18:09:44] server2.place6:~# ip l s vxlan4242 up [18:07:33] server3.place6:~# ip -6 link add vxlan4242 type vxlan id 4242 dstport 4789 local 2a0a:e5c0:2:1:21b:21ff:febb:68f0 group ff05::4242 dev bond0.11 ttl 5 [18:08:04] server3.place6:~# ip addr add 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::3/64 dev vxlan4242 [18:09:40] server3.place6:~# ip l s vxlan4242 up [18:09:49] server3.place6:~# ping 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2 PING 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2(2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2) 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.570 ms 64 bytes from 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.353 ms ^C --- 2a0a:e5c0:5:2::2 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1005ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.353/0.461/0.570/0.110 ms [18:09:54] server3.place6:~#
Created by opennebula¶
Creating vxlans with OpenNebula only makes them work on the same host. I assume that
- the
group
parameter may be wrong dstport
might or might not be right
How to solve¶
- Read https://vincent.bernat.ch/en/blog/2017-vxlan-linux to understand how it is supposed to work
- Analyse /var/tmp/one/vnm/vxlan/vxlan.rb
- Create some vxlan networks (see Networking, prefix 2a0a:e5c0:5::/48 is usable) and debug opennebula behaviour
- Find out the difference between the networks created by opennebula and the manual version above
- Fix/patch vxlan.rb
- Add patch to cdist / overwrite until opennebula fixed it
- Submit patch to opennebula / github
Updated by Mirjana Rupar over 5 years ago
Jin-Guk Kwon, can you update the status of the task, please?
Updated by Nico Schottelius over 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Rejected
Will not do -- we will implement this in ucloud
redmine@ungleich.ch writes:
Actions