Task #7545
closedSwitch production LDAPs to cdist-managed alpine
0%
Description
Our production LDAP nodes do not seem to be managed by cdist (anymore?): * No relevant mention in `grep -R __ungleich_ldap dot-cdist/` or `grep -R ldap1 dot-cdist/` * Deployed configuration do not exactly match `__ungleich_ldap` type.
=> Investigate and update dot-cdist to handle production ldap{1,2}.ungleich.ch
Updated by Timothée Floure almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to In Progress
Updated by Timothée Floure almost 5 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Waiting
I cleaned up and revamped the __ungleich_ldap type to run on alpine + deployed new ldap-stagin[1,2] nodes. I'm waiting to deploy a fix to __ungleich_nftables for firewalling and monitoring of the new setup.
I would like to move the production environment to this new deployment scheme next week when I am in Glarus.
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
- Subject changed from Investigate why production ldap{1,2}.ungleich.ch are not managed by dot-cdist to Switch production LDAPs to cdist-managed alpine
This is at the top of my TODO next time I come to Glarus, I don't want this to be delayed anymore.
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
- Status changed from Waiting to In Progress
- ldap3.ungleich.ch has been allocated.
- cdist configuration has been simplified, now making use of __openldap_server (alpine support being upstreamed via https://code.ungleich.ch/ungleich-public/cdist/-/merge_requests/909)
- ldap3.ungleich.ch is not syncing with ldap2/ldap1 due to TLS issues (= TLS handshake fail for some reason).
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
ldap3.ungleich.ch is now syncing with existing ldap1 and ldap2, although some objects fail to sync:
On ldap3.ungleich.ch:
Jul 24 11:42:57 alpine local4.debug slapd[26141]: syncrepl_message_to_entry: rid=002 mods check (objectClass: value #4 invalid per syntax) Jul 24 11:42:57 alpine local4.debug slapd[26141]: do_syncrepl: rid=002 rc 21 retrying
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
OUs sync properly but not user entries:
```
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: syncrepl_entry: rid=002 be_search (0)
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: syncrepl_entry: rid=002 ou=customer,dc=ungleich,dc=ch
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: syncrepl_entry: rid=002 entry unchanged, ignored (ou=customer,dc=ungleich,dc=ch)
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: syncrepl_message_to_entry: rid=002 DN: uid=kjg,ou=users,dc=ungleich,dc=ch, UUID: b6a5cd66-6630-1038-9dc5-01997400fff6
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: >>> dnPrettyNormal: <uid=kjg,ou=users,dc=ungleich,dc=ch>
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: <<< dnPrettyNormal: <uid=kjg,ou=users,dc=ungleich,dc=ch>, <uid=kjg,ou=users,dc=ungleich,dc=ch>
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: syncrepl_message_to_entry: rid=002 mods check (objectClass: value #4 invalid per syntax)
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: daemon: activity on 1 descriptor
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: daemon: activity on:
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218:
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: daemon: epoll: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=zero
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: daemon: epoll: listen=8 active_threads=0 tvp=zero
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: daemon: epoll: listen=9 active_threads=0 tvp=zero
Jul 24 11:43:50 alpine local4.debug slapd26218: do_syncrepl: rid=002 rc 21 retrying
```
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
Issue tracked down to `objectClass: ldapPublicKey`. The schema might have to be synced by hand / put into cdist.
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
Diff on files in /etc/(open)ldap/schema:
I /tmp » diff a b 13a14,15 > guacConfigGroup.ldif > guacConfigGroup.schema 17a20 > ldapns.schema 23a27,28 > openssh-ldap.ldif > openssh-ldap.schema 28d32 < xaa
=> Adding to cdist.
Updated by Timothée Floure over 4 years ago
ldap3.ungleich.ch is now synced to ldap1 and ldap2. I will replace ldap2 and ldap1 in a few days. I'll announce and try to do it early in the morning.
Updated by Timothée Floure almost 4 years ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Waiting
- Priority changed from High to Normal
Small update: this has still to be processed.
Updated by Timothée Floure over 3 years ago
- Status changed from Waiting to Closed
This is rotten - we will move the LDAP nodes to k8s. See #9473.